CO129-411 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [5-7] — Page 95

סון

|

The and point

Chathami views on

end 4 to 3189

3184)

the statement of His subject (pp 3-59

Mich

i

effection

.

argument at least ad hominem. against

M. Krisheri

-

Contention in

kit "in 1910

ont of In Fisher addressed foot on the subject y

Mlacing all fost buildings under

with

question of establiking

93

•

Guantity

hauch

surveying

рр.

to hum

(para 9 9 desf)) 5 ugaring

suy pested.

had his side of the case, except

the Law Courts, already,

I should to wichind to

We haven

Hell for that

Y apparis

cyands

revealed in

actual reduction in

control

personal.

But

#art

address

we

haven't jot

I duit

personally feel unchard

importance

to it.

to attach

The

mwerk

Fiskeri Ape

although th the commy wan Fisheri

condition

M

dult farth

dur

407

mi 1907 of

the work

# constuction

aupervising

bytt delay

#

NW

lorf

I

asumption

of designing, a

Schol

1 Anatomy,

nal stan

<

not

7.

nath material.

did not apparents

A

Th

pm

keni fill 1909

A

of end. 4

to 3189

как

13

W

Short

Am Fister

4

Mr. Chatham,

Coper

it appears from pu

his application for

dated

20 Feb. 1905.

Commision y

L

шар

G

btween!

the Poor

川

additional assistanc

independent

enguing, both into the light

Ifine a Law Courts scandal

Au

Rat

Hur

Ainh

do anything further.

th. Chatham (cept of

hind that

Kay

A

# working

P.W.D.

generall

I cannot

I don't

likel

k jet any

light

frain

temperament

clear that the Chathami methods,

A

76

fainty

indicated

# Pan incident,

the offerenty michat angefattention

attitude towards

Ih. Kishenin cyment for amcitance,

did litth to whicon th

latters difpiattis

a and him whether having band & K

dowth

Mich have been raised

administration q/k P.W.D.

consider Aut

at t

ho does not

would be advisalt L· holdi It E

# which question

independent exquing with on the spot.

Meanwhile

consult the Chattan

fara a (suorging hamch).

Russ

Our 23/6/14

کا

an

1